Eudaimonism: Juxtaposition to the Concept of the Last Judgment on Matthew 25:31-46

Alvyn Cesarianto Hendriks, Stimson Bernard Hutagalung, Jemmy Carter Najoan

Abstract


The concept of “last judgment” means punishment for the wicked and reward for the righteous with the ultimate goal of human life. Philosophers’ theories sometimes contradict the contents of the Bible. Does eudaimonism go against the Bible or support each other? This study endeavours to cultivate a deeper insight into Aristotle’s happiness theory-eudaimonia juxtaposed with the pericope in Matthew about the final judgment. With a literature review approach, this qualitative method interpreted the narrative through several stages. Eudaimonia walks in rhythm with the concept of the final judgment in Matthew 25:31–46. Eudaimonia is about doing virtue as a self-maximizing potential to achieve the ultimate goal of human life, which is judged by reason as a demand of someone’s current situation with the assumption that leads to the truth. Matthew 25:31-46 reveals that the determination of “last judgment” is judged through practical religion by sharing Jesus’ friendship “today” through virtue with those who hunger and thirst for truth. Those who do it will receive the kingdom of God, and those who do not will be thrown into eternal fire.


Keywords


Eudaimonism; Last Judgment; Matthew 25:31-46

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, Sarim, and Mohammad Jalaluddin. “Ethics and Morality in Islam and Hinduism.” INSANCITA: Journal of Islamic Studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia 1, no. 1 (2016): 37–42. https://journals.mindamas.com/index.php/insancita/article/download/28/27

Ayodeji, Olowu. “Christians’ Perception of the Concepts of Death and Judgment: A Multimodal Discourse Analytical Study of Selected Editions of Christian Women Mirror Magazine.” International Journal of English and Literature 4, no. 10 (2013): 508–515. http://academicjournals.org/article/article1383241275_AYODEJI.pdf.

Becker, Christian U., and Jack Hamblin. “Conceptualizing Personhood for Sustainability: A Buddhist Virtue Ethics Perspective.” Sustainibility 13 (2021): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169166

Charry, E. Theology after Psychology, Care for the Soul: Exploring the Intersection of Psychology and Theology. (Eds.) Mark McMinn and Timothy Phillips. IL: Inter Varsity Press, 2011.

Crisp, Roger. Nicomachean Ethics. UK: Cambrige University Press, 2004.

David, Susan A., Ilona Boniwel, and Amanda Conley Ayers. The Oxford Handbook of Happiness. UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. “Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Well-Being: An Introduction.” Journal of Happiness Studies 9, no. 1 (2008): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1

Diener, Ed, Derrick Wirtz, William Tov, Chu Kim-Prieto, Dong won Choi, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas-Diener. “New Well-Being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings.” Social Indicators Research 97, no. 2 (2010): 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

Ebrahimi, Mansoureh, and Kamaruzaman Yusoff. “Islamic Identity, Ethical Principles and Human Values.” European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 6, no. 1 (2017): 326-337. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v6i1.p325-336

Evans, Jules. Philosophy for Life and Other Dangerous Situations: Ancient Philosophy for Modern Problems. London: Rider Books, 2012.

Fargas, P., & J. M. Innes (eds.). Recent advances in social psychology: an inter- national perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1989.

Hall, Edith. Aristotle’s Way. London: The Bodley Way, 2014.

Hauerwas, Stanley. “Happiness, The Life of Virtue and Friendship: Theological Reflections on Aristotelian Themes Part I: On Being Temporally Happy.” The Asbury Theological Journal 45, no. 1 (1990): 5–19. https://place.asburyseminary.edu/asburyjournal/vol45/iss1/2/

Hommerich, C. & S. Klien. “Happiness: Does culture matter?” International Journal of Wellbeing 2, no. 4(2012): 292-298. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2.i4.1

Howard-Brook, Wes. Howard-Brook Wes, Becoming Children of God: John's Gospel and Radical Discipleship. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2003.

Hughes, Gerard J. Aristotle on Ethics. Canada: Routledge Philosophy GuideBooks, 2003.

Hursthouse, R. Environmental Virtue Ethics, In Rebecca L. Walker & Philip J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Environmental Ethics. UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Huta, Veronika. “Eudaimonia.” In Oxford Handbook of Happines. Eds. S. David, I. Boniwell, A. C. Ayers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Huta, Veronika, and Richard M. Ryan. “Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives.” Journal of Happiness Studies 11, no. 6 (2010): 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4

Kaczmarek, Lukasz Dominik. “Happyness," Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Switzerland, Springer, 2020, 1876.

Kenny, Anthony. The Aristotelian Ethic. UK: Clarendon Press, 2016.

Kleinman, Paul. Philosophy 101. Massacussets: Adams Media, 2013.

Krys, Kuba, Joonha Park, Agata Kocimska-Zych, Aleksandra Kosiarczyk, Heyla A. Selim, Agnieszka Wojtczuk-Turek, Brian W. Haas, et al. “Personal Life Satisfaction as a Measure of Societal Happiness Is an Individualistic Presumption: Evidence from Fifty Countries.” Journal of Happiness Studies 22, no. 5 (June 1, 2021): 2197–2214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00311-y

Louw, Daniël J. “Practical Theology as Life Science: Fides Quaerens Vivendi and Its Connection to Hebrew Thinking (Hālak).” In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi 51, no. 1 (2017): a2239. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i1.2239

Mise, Taysa-Rhea, and Michael A. Busseri. “The Full Life Revisited: Examining Hedonia and Eudaimonia as General Orientations, Motives for Activities, and Experiences of Wellbeing.” International Journal of Wellbeing 10, no. 4 (2020): 74–86. http://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v10i4.951

Njeri, George. “Surprise on the Day of Judgment in Matthew 25:31-46 and the Book of the Watchers.” Neotestamentica 54, no. 1 (2020): 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2020.0008

Pakaluk, Michael. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Putrawan, Bobby Kurnia, and Ludwig Beethoven Jones Noya. “Piety in Thoughts of John Wesley and Friedrich Schleiermacher.” Jurnal Jaffray 18, no. 1 (2020): 59-72. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v18i1.426

Ryan, Richard M., and Frank Martela. “Eudaimonia as a Way of Living: Connecting Aristotle with Self-Determination Theory” in J. Vittersø. Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Switzerland, Springer, 2016.

Seligman, Martin E. P., Tracy A. Steen, Nansook Park, and Christopher Peterson. “Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.” The American psychologist 60, no. 5 (2005): 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410

Sudarmanto, Eko, Ardhariksa Zukhruf Kurniullah, Erika Revida, Rolyana Ferinia, Marisi Butarbutar, Leon A. Abdilah, Andriasan Sudarso. Desain Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Medan: Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2021.

Venema, Cornelis P. “Justification and Judgment.” Table Talk Magazine. USA: An Outreach of Ligonier, (2021). Accesed March 3, https://tabletalkmagazine.com/article/2021/10/justification-and-judgment/

Wallace James, Virtues and Vices. Brook Street, LN: Cornell University Press, 1978.

Weyel, Birgit. “Practical Theology as a Hermeneutical Science of Lived Religion.” International Journal of Practical Theology 18, no. 1 (2014): 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijpt-2014-0012

White, E. G. SDA BIble Commentary. USA: Review and Herald, 1967.

White, Peter, and Samuel K. Afrane. “Maintaining Christian Virtues and Ethos in Christian Universities in Ghana: The Reality, Challenges and the Way Forward.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 73, no. 3 (2017): 4442. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4442




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25278/jj.v20i2.661
viewed = 0 times




Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Jaffray

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

pISSN 1829-9474
eISSN 2407-4047

Copyright © Jurnal Jaffray 2014-2023