Rereading of The Sabbath Law (Exodus 20: 8-11) as A Response to Modern Slavery Issue

Yohanes Rahdianto Suprandono, Robert Setio

Abstract


This research was motivated by concerns about the problem of modern slavery. The author will interpret Exodus 20:8-11 on the Sabbath to respond to the issue of slavery. The method of interpretation that will be used is deconstruction and social criticism. The use of the social criticism method sees the text as a practice of discourse that is ideologically charged and has specific interests. The text is not neutral but rather is advocating. In the text itself, two social groups conflict with each other. The interpretation of the existing Sabbath is interpreted normatively, legalistically, ritualistically, sociologically, theologically and eschatologically. The results of reinterpreting the Sabbath using a deconstructive method show that the Sabbath has been abolished because every day is interpreted as a forced workday. Forced labour is driven by fear and worry. The Sabbath was forgotten for political and economic motives. The Sabbath was abolished because time was money, so people were traded and enslaved for the sake of making money. The reinterpretation of the Sabbath text with the method of social criticism finds the theological meaning of the Sabbath. The God of the Sabbath is described as the forerunner of the liberation of slavery throughout the ages. God’s Sabbath-keeping people today have a liberation mission to help people who are victims of modern slavery.


Keywords


exegetical

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, T. D., David W. Baker. Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch. Westmont, Illinois: IVP Academic, 2002.

Barclay, John M. G. “Am I not a Man and a brother? The Bible and the British Anti-Slavery Campaign.” The Expository Times 119, no. 1 (2007): 3–14.

Blevins, Kent. “Observing Sabbath.” Review and Expositor 113, no. 4 (2016): 478-487.

Bosch, David J. Transformasi Misi Kristen: Sejarah Teologi Misi Yang Mengubah Dan Berubah. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2012.

Brueggemann, W. “The Book of Exodus.” In The New Interpreter’s Bible, ed. Leander E. Keck Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1994.

Bruggemann, Walter. Sabbath as Resistance: Saying No to The Culture of Now. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2014.

Christ, K. L., K. K. Rao and R. L. Burritt. “Accounting for modern slavery: an analysis of Australian listed company disclosures.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 32, no. 3 (2019): 836-865.

Clines, David J. “Images of Yahweh: God in the Pentateukh.” In Studies in Old Testament Theology, ed. Robert L. Hubbart, Robert K. Johnston, Robert P. Meye. Dallas: Word Publishing, 1992.

“Exodus 20:8.” Biblehub.com. https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/20-8.htm

Frey, Mathilde. “The Sabbath in the Pentateuch: An Exegetical and Theological Study.” Dissertations Ph.D., Andrew University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary, 2011. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/51

Gardiner, F. “Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers.” https://biblehub.com/commentaries/ellicott/ezekiel/22.htm

Gottwald, Norman K. A Light to the Nations. An Introduction to the Old Testament. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1959.

Haas, G. H. “Slave, Slavery.” In Dictionary Old Testament: Pentateuch, ed. T. Desmond Alexander, David W. Baker. Downers Grove, IL InterVarsity Press, 2003.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Seni Memahami. Hermeneutika Schleirmacher Sampai Derrida. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2015.

Johnson, Sylvester A. “The Bible, Slavery, and the Problem of Authority,” in Beyond Slavery. Black Religion/Woman Thought/Social Justice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113893_4

Kessler1, V. “The Sabbath as Remedy for Human Restlessness.” In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi 46, no. 2 (2012): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ids.v46i2.61

Leder, Arie C. “The Coherence of Exodus Narrative Unity and Meaning.” Calvin Theological Journal 36 (2001): 251–269.

Manoe, Herman A. “Resensi: Menolak Diam-Gereja Menolak Perdagangan Orang.” Gema Teologika: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian 4, no. 1 (2019): 121-124. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2019.41.425

Miller, Patrick D., ed. Old Theology Essays on Structure, Theme, and Text. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.

North, Garry. Authority and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Exodus Part 1: Representation and Dominion. Dallas: Point Five Press, 2012.

Packer, J. I. Merril C. Tenney. William White. Ensiklopedia Fakta Alktiab Bible Almanac- 1. Malang: Gandum Mas, 2003.

Palmiotto, Michael J. “Introduction: Human trafficking-modern slavery.” In Combating Human Trafficking a Multidisciplinary Approach. Edited by Michael J. Palmiotto. United states: CRC Press 2015.

Pelt, Miles V. Van, Gary D. Pratico. The Vocabulary Guide to Biblical Hebrew. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2003.

Singgih, Emanuel Gerrit. “Membaca Dan Menafsir Alkitab Di Indonesia.” Dalam Teologi Yang Membebaskan Dan Membebaskan Teologi.” Ed. Wahju S. Wibowo, Robert Setio. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Teologi UKDW, 2016.

Singgih, Emanuel Gerrit. “Resensi: Sebuah Teologi Perjanjian Lama Postmodernis.” Gema Teologika: Jurnal Teologi Kontekstual dan Filsafat Keilahian 1, no. 1 (2016): 117–118. https://doi.org/10.21460/gema.2016.11.217

Slavery Today, “What is modern slavery.” https://www.antislavery.org/slavery-today/modern-slavery/

Stringer, C., D. H. Whittaker, and G. Simmons. “New Zealand’s turbulent waters: the use of forced labour in the fishing industry.” Global Networks 16, no. 1, (2016): 3-24.

Strong, James. Strong’s New Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. Madison: World Bible Publishers, Inc, 1992.

Syafputri, Ella. “Apa Itu Perbudakan Modern.” Antaranews.com, November 18, 2014. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/464938/apa-itu-perbudakan-modern

The Global Slavery Index, “Executive Summary.” Walk Free Foundation, 2018. https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/executive-summary/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25278/jj.v19i2.564




Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Jaffray

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

pISSN 1829-9474
eISSN 2407-4047

Copyright © Jurnal Jaffray 2014-2023